The Coastside Fire Protection District is free to contract with Cal Fire. The referendum petition was ruled invalid. The 13 page opinion is being faxed to my office.
Ginny McShane
CFPD Director
The Coastside Fire Protection District is free to contract with Cal Fire. The referendum petition was ruled invalid. The 13 page opinion is being faxed to my office.
Ginny McShane
CFPD Director
Congratulations to the Coastside Board and their attorneys for winning this case.
Looking at the ruling that Barry linked to, the Appellate Panel pretty much said there was no legal excuse for Local 2400's attorneys to omit the Board's whole resolution on the CalFire contract in their petitions. The ruling said the Board had been careful and prudent and held numerous public meetings to deliberate the CalFire contract resolution. Local 2400's attorneys decision to not include the whereas clauses of the original resolution was a fatal legal mistake. Further, it was an attempt to make it look like the Board had acted without proper deliberation and care. The Board resolution was not all that long. Previous case law had required including the whole resolution and contract. The attempt of Local 2400 attorneys to make it appear that there were discrepancies between different section of the election code and that the law had changed were all dealt with point by point in the ruling. I see nothing but praise for how the Board approached their resolution on CalFire in this ruling. By implication the petition Local 2400's attorneys developed and put out for voter signatures was misleading. Finally, there is no new case law here. I'd speculate the careful way the ruling responded to Local 2400's convoluted arguments, would make a California Supreme Court appeal difficult.
Finally, thanks to the Coastside Chiefs, the Coastside Firefighters, the CalFire Chiefs and the CalFire Firefighters for providing us an invaluable service, while this contentious issue was being settled.
Just the facts: Where's the water for CCWD?, Jul 4 9:50am comment by Kevin J. Lansing, Ken Johnson has it right. Why is an elected school board member like Charles Gardner more occupied with things like…
Just the facts: Where's the water for CCWD?, Jul 3 10:43pm comment by Ken Johnson, Yes Paul, Charlie Gardner has an 'agenda' - do to MWSD what he accomplished at CUSD. He has been on…
Just the facts: Where's the water for CCWD?, Jul 3 5:57am comment by Paul Perkovic, Charlie, Do you have any MWSD agendas, staff reports, minutes, letters, etc. - i.e., some actual documentation - that supports…
Just the facts: Where's the water for CCWD?, Jul 2 10:44pm comment by Carl May, Mr. Gardner: Why an intertie with the NCCWD? You say "and only use the water when we need it." Do…
Just the facts: Where's the water for CCWD?, Jul 2 10:22pm comment by Ken Johnson, Charlie Gardner, You are good at asking questions and making unsupported claims - you are not very reliable at answering…
Just the facts: Where's the water for CCWD?, Jul 2 8:46pm comment by Charlie Gardner, Paul, What has MWSD done to investigate the possibility of an inter-tie to the north with Pacifica? Is it true…
Just the facts: Where's the water for CCWD?, Jul 2 5:31pm comment by Paul Perkovic, The analysis is very useful to Montara Water and Sanitary District (MWSD) customers, too. One of the misplaced attacks that…
Just the facts: Where's the water for CCWD?, Jul 2 1:47pm comment by Todd McGee, I'm sure Paul's analysis is correct and very useful to the CCWD customers. And I will readily admit that he…
Letter: Alternatives to July 4th fireworks?, Jul 2 12:29pm comment by Leonard Woren, What would the 2 sides be in a 2008 tug-of-war?
Just the facts: Where's the water for CCWD?, Jul 2 12:25pm comment by Leonard Woren, Every new CCWD customer increases the water cost for all existing CCWD customers. This is simple arithmetic, which "engineer" Jim…
A copy of the opinion can be found here:
http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/opinions/nonpub/A118789.PDF