County Times Coastside reporter Julia Scott wins journalism award

posted by Barry Parr on Sep 26, 2008 at 02:43 pm in  Media
2 comments • Click to email this story

Julia Scott, who covers the Coastside for the County Times, received an award as “Outstanding Emerging Journalist of the Year” from the Northern California chapter of the Society of Professional Journalists. Her reporting, according to the award…

displays a solid grasp of one of the most crucial issues in the Bay Area: water. Her reporting is thorough, her writing clear and concise as she explains the sometimes complex science and bureaucratic processes involved in monitoring and protecting the region’s most valuable resource. In a story titled “Troubled Waters” she explores the sources of the waste that contaminate a well-known Pacifica creek, and shows that there are no simple answers for a community trying to clean up the waters that eventually flow into the ocean. Similarly she reported on the wide range of pharmaceutical drugs that people have flushed into the Bay. Scott examines the complicated identification, monitoring and regulatory issues that stand in the way of removing these substances for the protection of humans and wildlife. Her coverage has provided important contributions to the public discussion of some of our most pressing environmental and public health issues.

Comments

Comment 1 by Barry Parr  on  Sep 26  at  2:44pm  •  All my comments • 

I link to her stories frequently from Coastsider, and I’ve always found her work to be thoughtful, fair, thorough, and informative. We’ve very lucky to have Julia Scott covering the Coastside.

Comment 2 by Don Pettengill  on  Sep 28  at  11:52pm  •  All my comments • 

Julia Scott was the San Mateo County Times reporter for coverage on one Cabrillo school bond measure, for which I attended a San Mateo Times interview, along with proponents. I didn’t find her coverage to be fair: proponents’ claims were uncritically echoed, while none of the strongest opposition points - even those in the voter pamphlet arguments - were so much as mentioned. I stopped returning her phone calls after the first election, since biased coverage is worse than no coverage.

To be fair to Ms. Scott, her coverage was no more slanted than that of the HMB Review, or editorially, the Coastsider; but to give the Coastsider its due, Jonathan Lovell’s analysis was published. While Jonathan supported the bond, he did give fair coverage of the actual arguments against it.

Epilogue: the bond failed. Jonathan ran for the school board. I supported him - despite being a polar opposite, politically - because even if he disagrees, he does acknowledge the opposition and is willing to thoughtfully consider what they have to say. Unsurprisingly, he lost the board election to more single-minded opponents. Too bad.

Strayed off the subject, but as for Ms. Scott - either her editor put the hammer down, or she is no political journalist IMO. Possibly she’s a fine journalist on uncontroversial factual science/public health issues. More power to her if she sticks with that.


Add your own comment

Please Register and Log in to post a comment.

 

Get your story or comment on Coastsider. If you're a member, log in to submit a story. Not a member? Please register to submit a story.