In an editorial in today’s Review, Debra Godshall writes,
In early July, the Review broke the story of the red-legged frog sighting at Wavecrest that all but derailed the Wavecrest Village project just days after the city had signed an agreement with Wavecrest Partners.
Actually, Coastsider broke the story on July 19. Two days later, on July 21, the Review followed our lead with a report skeptically titled “Biologist reportedly discovers red-legged frog in Wavecrest”. Even then, the nasty adverb “reportedly” intimated that the biologist, whom their reporter spoke to, might be lying. The Review didn’t “break” the story and it didn’t happen in “early July”.
A version of this comment was posted on the Midcoast-List on 10/14/04
I too noticed the glaring whopper in Debra Godshall’s editorial of 10/13/04. Anyone who subscribes to the Midcoast list or reads the Coastsider knows that, in fact, the Coastsider broke the story about red-legged frogs at Wavecrest, not the Review.
Moreover, the Review botched the subsequent coverage of the story by misreporting on 8/4/04 that “State and Federal Biologists Find No Frog at Wavecrest.”
In a letter to the editor dated 8/19/04, I pointed out the highly misleading nature of the Review story (written by Jeanine Gore) and an accompanying editorial (written by Debra Godshall). My letter can be found here:
http://www.hmbreview.com/articles/2004/08/19/news/lettertothe_editor/story12.txt
Barry Parr should be commended for providing a high-integrity source of news and information on the Coastside. We surely need one.
Kevin J. Lansing