Video: HMB City Council’s “Tuesday Night Meltdown”

posted by Barry Parr on Mar 04, 2006 at 07:39 pm in  Government   Video
5 comments • Click to email this story

Video removed at the request of MCTV.

At the Half Moon Bay City Council meeting on Tuesday, February 22, all attempts to bring about civility in government broke down.  If you haven’t seen the video yet, take the time to do so.  What happened on that night will hang over Half Moon Bay politics for the next two years. 

We’ll be talking about this more, but here are some things to watch for in the movie, along with the times in minutes and seconds when they take place.  I’ve heard different interpretations of this from both sides of the divide before I saw the actual video.  But one thing is very clear here: David Gorn and Jim Grady are very suprised and angry at what happens here. The video is almost exactly one hour long.


Part I: What’s the process?

Mayor Marina Fraser is presiding. City manager Deborah Ryan outlines the selection process.

David Gorn expresses surprise that no interviews would be conducted, and says that he expected to interview the candidates for the planning commission at the meeting, as it was done by the city council in the past. [6:25] Naomi Patridge says she interviewed candidates over the weekend [8:00]. Marina Fraser says she did as well.  Jim Grady says he also was expecting to interview candidates at the meeting [9:30].  Fraser says they could wait to interview at-large candidates. Patridge interrupts her to say that she doesn’t want to wait. Bonnie McClung agrees.  [11:30]

This is the first point where the audience becomes boisterous.  It’s muted on the tape, because MCTV uses the council members’ microphones, but it’s clear that a large contingent from one side showed up for this city council meeting.

During the public comment section, Terry Gossett, a resident of Moss Beach, describes the outgoing Planning Commission as “irresponsible and incompetent” and says “all sitting commissioners betrayed the will of the voters for a non-growth agenda”. [20:30]

Sofia Freer, an outgoing planning commissioner asks that copies of the candidates’ “Willing to Serve” forms be made available to the audience during the meeting. She’s told they can be found at City Hall.

Jim Grady notes that there is no information the “Willing to Serve” forms of many of the candidates and that he’s uncomfortable voting on these people for the planning commission. [24:30] Bonnie McClung says that the process was emailed to the council members and that Grady should have let the city manager know ahead of time if he was uncomfortable with the process.


Part II: The council members nominate their candidates, and some get surprised

Marina Fraser begins the process of individual nominations with David Gorn, who nominates Kevin Lansing. [28:00] Gorn nominates Mike Ferreira. McClung nominates Doug Snow. Patridge nominates Patric Jonsson, and Fraser Tom Roman. Marina Fraser asks for comments on the nominations. There is none.

Kevin Lansing is approved 5-0.  [39:40]

The vote is held on Grady’s nomination of Mike Ferreira.  [39:50] Note Grady’s and Gorn’s surprise, which is noticeable even on this tiny video, when McClung votes “no”.  Gorn yells, “Whoa” and notes that there was no discussion of Ferreira’s merits. Without missing a beat, Marina Fraser says, “That is correct.” Listen to the hubbub from the audience. Gorn: “That’s really tricky. That’s really sneaky.” This is where the meeting begins to break down.  Bonnie counters Jim by saying she does not think Mike is a fit for the planning commission and the audience erupts into applause. Grady withdraws his nomination.

After a long discussion, Fraser moves on to the next nomination. Gorn and Grady abstain. After the vote on Patridge’s nomination (Gorn and Grady abstain), the audience erupts into applause. In response to the vote and the applause from the audience, Gorn yells sarcastically, “Let the healing begin!” [41:50]

After the vote on the members’ individual nominations, Grady says he’s withholding his nomination until a later date.  [42:30]


Part III: Gorn and Grady drop out of the meeting

The nomination of the at-large members proceeds without participation from Gorn and Grady. During the discussion, Gorn, getting no help from the chair, asks the audience to be quiet while he’s speaking. [48:20].

As the voting on at-large candidates begins [54:00], Gorn declares the process a “charade”. McClung, clearly distracted by what’s happening, becomes disoriented during the vote first vote.  Gorn and Grady abstain on all votes. During the voting, Gorn has to ask two people in the audience to “Stop making fun of us.” On the final vote, for Linda Poncini, McClung looks very relieved and says, “Finally, yes!”

Grady takes exception to Patridge’s declaration that “You guys attacked me” and Patridge replies.  [58:36].

A note of thanks: Coastsider has been working for nearly two weeks to get this video online. It’s the first video that Coastsider has streamed and we learned a lot by trial and error. But it would have been impossible without the help of several volunteers who helped us encode and upload MCTV’s video of the meeting to our server. Please let us know if you have problems with the video. This video has been tested on Mac Safari and Firefox, and Windows Firefox and Internet Explorer.

Comments

Comment 1 by Mark Massara  on  Mar 05  at  12:10pm  •  All my comments • 

I suppose it is now clear that the failure to re-elect City Council member Mike Ferreira is going to adversely impact and affect HMB for....a long time to come. It seems like Deja Vu to me. HMB used to be a laughstock little community, wayward and backward in planning and lack of respect for it's glorious coastal resources, where the good ol' boys and girls approved project after lame project only to see them repeatedly denied by the Coastal Commission.

Then, for a few short years sanity prevailed. And now this....back to the future with small minds acting out in public grasping for the short term gain of a few at the expense of long term residents and the environment. Those embarrassing days are BACK!

Keep going for it, and we'll look forward to cleaning up your mess at the Coastal Commission all over again..... markm

Comment 2 by Suzanne  on  Mar 05  at  1:52pm  •  All my comments • 

Thank you for an extraordinary public service, Coastsider! Let's hope that every resident of Half Moon Bay and the Coastside who missed the MCTV live telecast takes the time to watch this. It is an education in how not to run a railroad--or a city.

Suzanne Black

Comment 3 by lani ream  on  Mar 05  at  4:18pm  •  All my comments • 

Had Naomi, Marina and Bonnie voted to change the ordinance to reduce the Commission to five (as Naomi pointed out in the video was what she had wanted) and change the terms to be concurrent with the elections of the City Council ( the only community in the entire Bay Area to have that adjustment) the citizens of Half Moon Bay could have had a voice through a referendum. This would have given the above three a choice of putting the proposed change before the voters or placing the change on the "table" for a year. Naomi could still have removed "her" Commissioner (this process is provided for in the existing ordinance) as could have Marina and Bonnie but the Commission would have had four remaining currently seated members. I think two terms would have ended in 2006 so there would be opportunities ahead to further nominate Commissioners. But the objective was always clearly to unseat as many of the current Commissioners as possible and gain the majority vote. I am proud to have served during what Mark has termed a "short" period of sanity and I thank those Commissioners I served with for their time and committment. The message is very clear in this video. Jim Grady and Dave Gorn can "participate" in the process but their choice will only be honored if the majority approves; A hard lesson to learn in front of the public. Also, the interview process of 1998 was done before the entire Council and available to the public to attend. Evidently some applicants were interviewed by individual Council members over the phone while others thought it was a public process. The nominations should have stopped right there until that confusion was clarified, in my opinion. How is it possible to judge a potential applicant for selection if that process has not taken place? If it had been agreed upon that everyone would do their own interviews that would have been different. lani ream

Comment 4 by Kevin J. Lansing  on  Mar 06  at  2:05am  •  All my comments • 

I first applied for a position on the Planning Commission in late 2001. At that time, there were no openings, but an "At-large" position did become available some time later.

The City Council scheduled a noticed special meeting to interview all of the candidates (there were many) at 20 minute intervals. The interviews were videotaped and later broadcast on MCTV. The "Willing to Serve" forms of all candidates (a sort of resume) were included in a binder that was available for the public to inspect at the special meeting.

After the interviews, the City Council selected James Kellenberger for the At-large appointee.

Over two years later, in early 2004, another At-large position became available when Commissioner Don Heinz resigned. Again I applied for the open position, this time along with four other candidates, and again the City Council held a noticed special meeting where all of the candidates were interviewed on videotape.

After those interviews, I was fortunate to have been selected to serve as an At-large Planning Commissioner.

http://www.hmbreview.com/articles/2004/02/11/news/local_news/story13.txt

So, based on my experience, the appointment procedure that was followed at the February 22 City Council meeting was not in any way consistent with previous City practice.

Comment 5 by Brian Ginna  on  Mar 08  at  12:40pm  •  All my comments • 

Mr. Massara,

I have looked back at your post a few times and have to admit that I remain baffled at the utter lack of respect you show here for the voters/citizens of HMB. You want to criticize a politician - go ahead, but be direct and, as Barry repeated, have a little class. But to attack the majority of the voters like that? uncalled for.

Is this what the Sierra Club is really about? Guess I now have additional confirmation of why I have never supported what is essentially an "inside the Beltway" policy influencer.

You might are effective at local action but I am guessing you are not going to be leading their public relations campaign anytime soon. Perhaps they were your personal comments and not reflective of the organization as a whole. If that is the case, then you should probably remove the link to your website.

"Keep going for it, and we’ll look forward to cleaning up your mess at the Coastal Commission all over again..... "

That's such positive message to leave us with. Thanks for coming.

In any event, I am forwarding a copy of your comments to the LP chapter coordinators/chairs/etc. so they are aware of your disdain for HMB. Maybe they don't care.

P.S. there was no "failure to re-elect" anyone. Ferreira failed to get elected.


Add your own comment

Please Register and Log in to post a comment.

 

Get your story or comment on Coastsider. If you're a member, log in to submit a story. Not a member? Please register to submit a story.

Search Coastside and San Mateo County media.