Why didn’t the Review endorse Jim Harvey for MWSD?

posted by Barry Parr on Oct 27, 2005 at 05:41 pm in  Environment   Media
3 comments • Click to email this story

In its endorsements for the Montara Water and Sanitary District, the Half Moon Bay Review seems to have gotten confused.

In endorsing Paul Perkovic, Bob Ptacek, and Peggy Ruse for seats on the board, the Review concluded:

That leaves Jim Harvey the odd man out. He was appointed to his current seat three years ago and generally agrees with the other incumbents on issues of planning and water supply. He has been a good steward; we simply found him the least strong of four good candidates.

Actually, although Jim Harvey was appointed to his seat three years ago, it was a two-year seat and he stood for election in 2003. In that election, he was endorsed by the Review over Peggy Ruse [Review’s 2003 endorsements], who was running against him for the two-year seat, and Harvey soundly defeated Ruse [PDF of election results], with 55% of the votes to Ruse’s 8% (she was fourth in a four-way race).

Coastsiders have written to the Review to set the record straight, but none of their letters appeared in Wednesday’s paper, the first after the paper’s MWSD endorsement appeared.

Review Managing Editor Clay Lambert replied to Coastsider’s email asking what happened:

I think even the folks who complain about the newspaper (at least those who take the time to correspond) know that I print virtually every letter I get—including those that are critical of me. Frequent writers also know that I print them in the order in which they are received. I ran out of room for about a half-dozen last week. I will make every effort to get them all in this week.

Jim Harvey, a good and thoughtful man who impressed me very much during our interview, was originally appointed and subsequently elected. That could have been more clear in our endorsement.

Comments

Comment 1 by david gorn  on  Oct 28  at  11:02am  •  All my comments • 

Jim Harvey knows water, that’s tremendously clear whenever you start to talk to him about water policy on the north coastside. That’s because he’s been at it a long time — he was one of the original driving forces to push for Montara and Moss Beach to form its own water agency and jettison Citizens Utilities and then Cal-Am.

Plus I just like him, he’s a gentleman, and pretty apolitical as far as I can tell, it seems like all he cares about is water — so after the Review’s non-endorsement, it’s nice to see the outpouring of support for him.

David Gorn

Comment 2 by Barry Parr  on  Oct 29  at  10:43am  •  All my comments • 

Here’s a copy of one letter that the Review didn’t publish this week.

bp

Gary Warhaftig Post Office Box 938 Montara, Ca. 94037 Tel: (650) 728-3806 e-mail:

October 20, 2005

Dear Editor,

Jim Harvey is running for a Board position on the Montara Water and Sanitary District and I would like to make some corrections to your editorial of October 12. You are incorrect in saying that he was appointed to his current seat. Over three years ago he was appointed to the Board to fill a vacancy. Then in November, 2003, he ran for office and was elected by the voters . The Community recognized the value of Jims contributions by giving him more than double the votes of his nearest competitor.

Labeling him as the “odd man out”, and then stating erroneously that he was appointed to his current seat on the Board, obscures the fact that he has been actively involved with water issues in Montara and Moss Beach for 20 years. Jim and I along with a handful of others co-founded the Montara Moss Beach Water Improvement Association in the 1980’s. The MMBWIA began the process that culminated in our gaining control of our own water system. Jim not only uses his knowledge of water to bear on issues but he has an understanding of the history of water in our community .

As long as Jim Harvey is willing to be available for another term of community service, I will enthusiastically vote for him.

Gary Warhaftig President Montara Moss Beach Water Improvement Association

Comment 3 by Scott Boyd  on  Nov 03  at  12:15pm  •  All my comments • 

This week’s Review published several letters having to do with the election. This seems to violate their long-standing policy to publish no campaign-related letters in the final issue before the election.

The rationale has been that allowing last-minute letters would allow no time for correction or rebuttal.

Two of the letters were in support of Jim Harvey, correcting the Review’s misrepresentation of Jim’s status as an elected official. The Review stated he was appointed, when, in fact, he was elected overwhelmingly shortly after the board appointed him to fill a vacancy.

One might argue that the Review violated its policy in publishing these letters. That’s debatable, since these letters were, in fact, rebutting the Review’s error.

The Review, however, had possession of these letters prior to the previous week’s deadline, and apparently felt that their policy on first-come, first-served on letters to the editor outweighed the need to correct their own serious error.

As to the long-standing policy, the Review chose to publish two letter critical of the council, and a third calling outright for voters to choose new city council members.

The Review has some explaining to do.


Add your own comment

Please Register and Log in to post a comment.

 

Get your story or comment on Coastsider. If you're a member, log in to submit a story. Not a member? Please register to submit a story.
Search Coastside and San Mateo County media.