Today Mostly sunny, with a high near 68. WSW wind 5 to 9 mph.
Tonight Mostly clear, with a low around 52. WSW wind 5 to 9 mph becoming calm in the evening.
Saturday Sunny, with a high near 73. Calm wind becoming west 5 to 8 mph in the morning.
Saturday Night Mostly clear, with a low around 53. West wind 5 to 8 mph becoming calm in the evening.
Sunday Sunny, with a high near 73. Calm wind becoming SW 5 to 7 mph in the morning.
Sunday Night Partly cloudy, with a low around 52.
Monday Mostly sunny, with a high near 68.
Monday Night Partly cloudy, with a low around 52.
Tuesday Sunny, with a high near 65.
Tuesday Night Mostly clear, with a low around 51.
Wednesday Sunny, with a high near 64.
Wednesday Night Mostly clear, with a low around 50.
Thursday Mostly sunny, with a high near 65.
PFC: 10:20am; AFD: 8:51am
Thu, December 10, 2009 3:40pm
Kevin J. Lansing
All my comments
The link below is for the Deputy Director’s report for the North Central Coast District.
Deputy Director’s Report, 12-10-2009
On page 2 you can seee a list of all the peoople who faxed in comment letters, and then the actual letters are attached to the end of the report.
Many thanks to those who sent in letters supporting the Costal Commmission staff recommendations which seem to have prevailed.
Thu, December 10, 2009 5:40pm
Leonard Woren
All my comments
Let’s hope the Board of Supervisors does the right thing and accepts the modifications.
What the Commission did is the normal procedure: they cannot themselves make changes in a submitted LCP amendment, so what they do is first move to approve it as submitted, recommending a “no” vote. Then when that motion fails, they make another motion to approve with modifications, generally as recommended by their staff. If that passes, they are essentially “pre-approving” the modified version if the submitting agency agrees to accept the modifications. The Board now needs to agendize and hopefully approve the modifications in order for the update to take effect.
Fri, December 11, 2009 8:23am
Kevin Barron
All my comments
Shocker… (sarcasm) that the CCC recommended a NO vote. Anything less would of been as hypocritical as Al Gore not flying commercial in coach.
I noticed in the Dep Dir’s Report a letter from a resident of ~50 years, whom 10+ years ago followed the appropriate protocol via permits and such to build, and frankly will be left only to sue if the LCP moves forward. I’m curious if there’s “nothing to see here”, or if once again, no-growthers and NIMBYism is setting legal ‘trip wires’ for themselves to stumble into once again. Lack of a better analogy, I see an effort in doing your best to remove the “chicken” of allowable infrastructure, so as to prevent the “egg” of coastal growth & progress.